Cheapest LLM that's good enough.

Snapshot 2026-10-16 · Quality bar 90% · Cost mode: batch if supported · 54 tasks · 27 models

In our busiest week we made over 180,000 calls to large-language models, and we let the outputs be evaluated by a panel of leading models. Cost per token doesn't track quality — and when you say something like "give me the model that's reliably 95% as good as the best one but most cost-effective", the best-value model typically saves north of 90% of the cost.

This benchmark publishes our results so other builders can answer the same question for their own pipelines: which model(s) are good enough and the most cost-efficient for each category of tasks. The data also shows that the most expensive model — even when your budget can pay for it — is not always the best performer.

Have a look. Tell us what you think. We can also run tests for you — reach us at benchmark@fronset.ai.

Cost mode:

Right-sized per step

Best-value model per capability, at your quality bar. Greyed cells mean no model qualifies on that category yet.

ModelFinancial Analysis & Trading DecisionsStructured Data & Fact ExtractionContent Summarization & SynthesisLong-form Content GenerationSocial & Promotional ContentRelevance, Classification & MatchingTopic Organization & ClusteringInfrastructure & UtilityEvidence-Grounded Hypothesis GenerationQualifies on
Qwen 3.7 Plus Alibaba Cloud (DashScope)3.9x22x12x13x14x ★15x ★6.7x15x1.0x ★23/54
Qwen 3.8 Max Alibaba Cloud (DashScope)36x192x105x163x223x104x243x215x10x20/54
Qwen 3.8 Flash Alibaba Cloud (DashScope)—29x——31x26x———5/54
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic36x91x54x67x39x66x36x63x—33/54
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic14x46x30x30x19x27x18x30x—24/54
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic—1.0x ★1.2x1.8x ★1.6x ★3x ★—2x—17/54
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek2.1x ★4.3x4.6x4.1x10x4.9x ★1.9x12x—18/54
Gemini 3.8 Flash Gemini2.4x10x13x10x18x11x5.4x22x1.5x24/54
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Gemini——3.2x—2.3x3.2x—4.2x—7/54
Moonshot Kimi K3 Moonshot AI69x67x111x27x166x97x118x126x15x37/54
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI13x29x20x16x18x17x11x21x—28/54
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI1.0x ★1.2x ★1.1x ★1.0x ★1.0x ★1.5x ★1.0x1.2x ★—24/54
Meta Muse Spark 1.3 OpenRouter24x31x45x39x74x43x36x67x3.7x34/54
Thinking Machines Inkling OpenRouter23x3.1x88x22x ★107x91x58x81x5.3x29/54
Tencent Hy4 Preview OpenRouter33x69x69x77x221x70x35x96x9.8x27/54
Thinking Machines Inkling Small OpenRouter9.2x9.8x ★15x8.8x ★26x12x ★8.4x17x1.0x27/54
MiniMax M3 OpenRouter2.4x ★6.2x7.7x2.4x ★12x3.7x ★2.8x5x ★1.1x23/54
Tencent Hy3 OpenRouter—10x8.3x3.2x10x7.7x3.8x ★13x—16/54
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Ultra 550B OpenRouter———11x22x24x12x20x—12/54
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Super 120B OpenRouter—2.6x2.1x—7.8x7.4x———6/54
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B OpenRouter—————2.4x———2/54
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning OpenRouter—————8.2x———2/54
Grok 4.7 xAI45x—91x70x199x69x130x145x—29/54
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro Xiaomi MiMo2.1x3x3.1x2x3.3x3.2x4.5x3.3x—20/54
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash Xiaomi MiMo—1.0x ★1.0x ★—1.0x ★1.7x ★1.0x ★1.0x ★—16/54
GLM-5.3 Z.AI116x—268x189x564x154x238x355x—27/54
GLM-5.3 Flash Z.AI13x—20x19x17x12x ★24x ★30x—27/54
Each cell shows how much you overpay vs the best-value good-enough model in that category: best value most expensive Cells show how much you overpay vs the best-value model clearing the bar (1.0x = this model is the best-value good-enough option, no overpayment; 3.2x = you pay ~3× more on average for the same quality). ★ marks any model that is the best-value pick on at least one of the category's tasks (multiple stars per column are possible — they're the per-task cost winners). Greyed cells: model doesn't qualify on any task in that category at the current bar. Rows grouped by provider; click a model name for the full per-task breakdown.

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-16 · 90% quality bar

By capability

Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions

Read business/financial docs deeply enough to make forward-looking judgments about opportunity and risk.

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
GPT-6 Luna ★2/3$0.87best value
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ★3/4$3.062.1x
MiniMax M3 ★2/4$3.912.4x
Gemini 3.8 Flash1/4$4.382.4x
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro1/4$7.752.1x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-16 · 90% quality bar

See all 18 qualifying models →

Structured Data & Fact Extraction

Precise pattern recognition and field-level information retrieval, strict schema adherence.

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
Claude Haiku 5.5 ★1/2$0.35best value
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash ★1/2$0.74best value
GPT-6 Luna ★2/3$0.831.2x
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Super 120B1/1$0.932.6x
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro1/2$2.223x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-16 · 90% quality bar

See all 20 qualifying models →

Content Summarization & Synthesis

Compress long input into essential nuggets without losing material detail.

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash ★1/3$0.36best value
Claude Haiku 5.51/4$0.501.2x
GPT-6 Luna ★4/4$1.151.1x
MiniMax M32/3$2.897.7x
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash3/4$3.024.6x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-16 · 90% quality bar

See all 23 qualifying models →

Long-form Content Generation

Sustained compositional skill, voice consistency, coherent extended prose.

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
GPT-6 Luna ★2/3$0.41best value
MiniMax M3 ★3/3$1.062.4x
Tencent Hy31/3$1.363.2x
Claude Haiku 5.5 ★3/3$1.411.8x
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash1/2$1.614.1x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-16 · 90% quality bar

See all 21 qualifying models →

Social & Promotional Content

Conciseness, platform-native conventions, engagement under tight character limits.

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash ★2/3$0.21best value
GPT-6 Luna ★1/3$0.21best value
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite1/4$0.492.3x
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro2/2$0.703.3x
Claude Haiku 5.5 ★3/4$0.831.6x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-16 · 90% quality bar

See all 25 qualifying models →

Relevance, Classification & Matching

Semantic similarity judgment: does this thing belong in that bucket / match that target?

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B2/7$0.202.4x
Tencent Hy33/11$0.417.7x
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash ★6/8$0.691.7x
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Super 120B3/9$0.737.4x
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning2/5$0.848.2x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-16 · 90% quality bar

See all 27 qualifying models →

Topic Organization & Clustering

Discover natural groupings without external schema, name and order them coherently.

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash ★2/2$0.56best value
GPT-6 Luna1/2$0.88best value
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro1/3$1.104.5x
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash1/3$1.621.9x
Gemini 3.8 Flash2/4$2.045.4x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-16 · 90% quality bar

See all 21 qualifying models →

Infrastructure & Utility

Mechanical competence at format conversion, metadata manipulation, prompt rewriting, translation; minimal domain expertise required.

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash ★4/6$0.13best value
Claude Haiku 5.53/4$0.232x
GPT-6 Luna ★7/7$0.341.2x
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro3/4$0.443.3x
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite1/6$0.664.2x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-16 · 90% quality bar

See all 23 qualifying models →

Evidence-Grounded Hypothesis Generation

Derive distinct, arguable hypotheses or claims from a source document while grounding and citing each one strictly in a supplied set of approved evidence.

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
Qwen 3.7 Plus ★1/1$4.96best value
Thinking Machines Inkling Small1/1$5.02best value
MiniMax M31/1$5.571.1x
Gemini 3.8 Flash1/1$7.541.5x
Meta Muse Spark 1.31/1$18.403.7x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-16 · 90% quality bar

See all 9 qualifying models →

Methodology, briefly

Quality scores come from LLM-judge verdicts on production workloads, on a 0–10 scale. Only MEDIUM-or-better cells qualify. The quality bar is relative to the best-performing model on each task — adjust the slider above to see your own pipeline.

Full methodology →

What changed this week

What changed — 2026-09-24 → 2026-10-16

  • Tasks: 54 (+1) · Models: 27 (-3) · Model–task pairs: 906 (+94) · Graded samples: 46,711 (-9,021)

New capabilities (2):

  • Capability Category Matching — capability-category-matching (relevance_and_classification)
  • Claim Continuity Classification — claim-continuity-classification (relevance_and_classification)

Removed capabilities (1):

  • Known Url Content Extraction — known-url-content-extraction

New models: Claude Haiku 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Sonnet 5.5, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GPT-6 Luna, GPT-6 Sol, Grok 4.7, Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash, Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro

Dropped models: Claude Haiku 4.5, Claude Opus 5, Claude Sonnet 5, DeepSeek V4 Flash, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, Gemini 3.5 Flash, GPT-5.4 Nano, GPT-5.6 Luna, GPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-5.6 Terra, Grok 4.6

Per-model movement

(every model, 90% bar) — best value = tasks where the model is the cheapest good-enough option, counted separately under each cost mode; qualifying = tasks it’s good-enough on (quality only, so it is the same under both modes). A model with no batch API prices batch at its sync rate, so the two best-value columns diverge wherever a provider batch discount decides the winner:

ModelBest Value (Sync)Best Value (Async/Batch)Qualifying
GPT-6 Luna (new)12 (new)15 (new)24 (new)
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash (new)13 (new)14 (new)16 (new)
MiniMax M37 (-6)5 (-4)23 (+1)
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (new)5 (new)5 (new)18 (new)
Claude Haiku 5.5 (new)4 (new)4 (new)17 (new)
GLM-5.3 Flash3 (+1)3 (+2)27 (+9)
Thinking Machines Inkling Small33 (+1)27
Qwen 3.7 Plus33 (+3)23 (+1)
Tencent Hy32 (-2)1 (-2)16 (+3)
Thinking Machines Inkling1129 (+1)
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Super 120B10 (-1)6 (-1)
Moonshot Kimi K30037 (+13)
Meta Muse Spark 1.30034 (+12)
Claude Opus 5.5 (new)0 (new)0 (new)33 (new)
Grok 4.7 (new)0 (new)0 (new)29 (new)
GPT-6 Sol (new)0 (new)0 (new)28 (new)
GLM-5.30027 (+6)
Tencent Hy4 Preview0027 (+8)
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (new)0 (new)0 (new)24 (new)
Gemini 3.8 Flash00 (-1)24 (+7)
Qwen 3.8 Max0020 (+9)
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro (new)0 (new)0 (new)20 (new)
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Ultra 550B0 (-1)0 (-1)12
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite007
Qwen 3.8 Flash005 (+1)
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning002
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B002
Claude Haiku 4.5 (dropped)— (was 0)— (was 0)— (was 9)
Claude Opus 5 (dropped)— (was 1)— (was 1)— (was 17)
Claude Sonnet 5 (dropped)— (was 1)— (was 3)— (was 25)
DeepSeek V4 Flash (dropped)— (was 3)— (was 3)— (was 19)
DeepSeek V4 Pro (dropped)— (was 0)— (was 0)— (was 23)
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (dropped)— (was 6)— (was 3)— (was 7)
Gemini 3.5 Flash (dropped)— (was 1)— (was 1)— (was 36)
GPT-5.4 Nano (dropped)— (was 0)— (was 2)— (was 10)
GPT-5.6 Luna (dropped)— (was 13)— (was 20)— (was 25)
GPT-5.6 Sol (dropped)— (was 0)— (was 0)— (was 30)
GPT-5.6 Terra (dropped)— (was 0)— (was 1)— (was 30)
Grok 4.6 (dropped)— (was 0)— (was 0)— (was 23)

Full changelog →