Claude Opus 4.7 (archived)
Good enough on 0/48 tasks at the 90% bar. Best value on 0 tasks. Best fit for: Infrastructure & Utility, Long-form Content Generation, Topic Organization & Clustering, Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions, Structured Data & Fact Extraction.
Cost vs quality across all tasks, as of 24 June 2026
This model doesn't qualify on any task at the 90% bar.
Per-task breakdown, as of 24 June 2026
| Task | Category | Quality (% of best) | Confidence | Overpay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Substack Newsletter best | Long-form Content Generation | 100% | HIGH | — |
| Geographic Region Identification | Structured Data & Fact Extraction | 98% | RANKED | — |
| Claim-Referenced Analyst Writing | Long-form Content Generation | 97% | MEDIUM | — |
| X Post Selection | Relevance, Classification & Matching | 99% | HIGH | — |
| Activity Feed Blurb Generation | Social & Promotional Content | 97% | MEDIUM | — |
| Onboarding Chapter Prompt Adaptation | Infrastructure & Utility | 97% | HIGH | — |
| Author Matching | Relevance, Classification & Matching | 94% | MEDIUM | — |
| SEC Filing Analysis | Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions | 96% | MEDIUM | — |
| Topic Grouping and Client Matching | Relevance, Classification & Matching | 94% | HIGH | — |
| Topic Cluster Naming | Topic Organization & Clustering | 96% | HIGH | — |
| Topic Discovery Clustering best | Topic Organization & Clustering | 100% | HIGH | — |
| Publication Title Generation | Content Summarization & Synthesis | 92% | MEDIUM | — |
| Reddit Post Generation | Social & Promotional Content | 92% | HIGH | — |
| Structured Output Extraction | Structured Data & Fact Extraction | 92% | HIGH | — |
| Executive Summary Generation | Content Summarization & Synthesis | 98% | MEDIUM | — |
| Investment Panel Voting | Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions | 98% | MEDIUM | — |
| Prompt Adaptation | Infrastructure & Utility | 100% | RANKED | — |
| Image Prompt Generation | Infrastructure & Utility | 96% | RANKED | — |
| Trading Recommendation | Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions | 96% | RANKED | — |
| Author Voice Generation | Long-form Content Generation | 98% | RANKED | — |
| S-1 TOC Extraction | Structured Data & Fact Extraction | 92% | MEDIUM | — |
Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that clears the quality bar on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.