Gemini 3 Flash Preview (archived)
Good enough on 0/40 tasks at the 95% bar. Best value on 0 tasks. Doesn't qualify on any: Topic Organization & Clustering, Content Summarization & Synthesis, Long-form Content Generation, Structured Data & Fact Extraction, Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions, Social & Promotional Content.
Cost vs quality across all tasks, as of 5 June 2026
This model doesn't qualify on any task at the 95% bar.
Per-task breakdown, as of 5 June 2026
| Task | Category | Quality (% of best) | Confidence | Overpay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claim Refinement | Infrastructure & Utility | 99% | RANKED | — |
| Research Query Generation | Infrastructure & Utility | 96% | HIGH | — |
| Subreddit Selection for Research | Relevance, Classification & Matching | 97% | HIGH | — |
Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that clears the quality bar on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.