Fronset Benchmark

Alibaba Qwen3.7-Flash (archived)

Provider
Alibaba Cloud (DashScope)
Model name
qwen3.7-flash
Last benchmarked
Qualified on
9 / 52 tasks (at the 90% bar)
Best value on
7 tasks

Good enough on 9/52 tasks at the 90% bar. Best value on 7 tasks. Best fit for: Infrastructure & Utility. Doesn't qualify on any: Structured Data & Fact Extraction, Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions, Social & Promotional Content, Content Summarization & Synthesis, Topic Organization & Clustering.

Cost vs quality across all tasks, as of 5 September 2026

0%25%50%75%100%78910Quality score (7–10)Cost-efficiency vs best value (1.0 = best value)Newsletter Copy Generation — quality 8.73, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Batch Text Translation — quality 8.62, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Social Post Portfolio Selection — quality 8.47, 2.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMetadata Paragraph Rewriting — quality 8.54, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Model Specific Prompt Adaptation — quality 8.30, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Section Prompt Generation — quality 7.74, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Language Identification — quality 9.83, 1.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEngagement Opportunity Triage — quality 8.42, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Content To Image Prompt Generation — quality 8.19, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★

within ~1.3× of the best-value model · 1.3–2× · >2× · ★ this model is the best-value pick on that task. Top-right = best quadrant. Only tasks where this model qualifies at the 90% bar are plotted.

Per-task breakdown, as of 5 September 2026

TaskCategoryQuality (% of best)ConfidenceOverpay
Content To Image Prompt Generation ★Infrastructure & Utility91%HIGHbest value
Model Specific Prompt Adaptation ★Infrastructure & Utility94%MEDIUMbest value
Newsletter Copy Generation ★Long-form Content Generation94%RANKEDbest value
Batch Text Translation ★Infrastructure & Utility92%HIGHbest value
Section Prompt Generation ★Infrastructure & Utility91%MEDIUMbest value
Engagement Opportunity Triage ★Relevance, Classification & Matching95%HIGHbest value
Metadata Paragraph Rewriting ★Infrastructure & Utility91%MEDIUMbest value
Language IdentificationRelevance, Classification & Matching98%RANKED1.7x
Social Post Portfolio SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching96%HIGH2.4x

Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that clears the quality bar on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.