Provider
Z.AI
Model name
glm-5.3
Cost mode:
Qualifies on
27 / 54 tasks (at 90% bar)
Best value on
0 tasks

Cost vs quality across all tasks

0%25%50%75%100%78910Quality score (7–10)Cost-efficiency vs best value (1.0 = best value)Public Response Generation — quality 7.74, 755.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionVoice Profile Generation — quality 9.48, 164.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Sequence Optimization — quality 8.88, 719.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Message Generation — quality 8.46, 628.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Query Validation — quality 8.28, 523.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBatch Text Translation — quality 8.92, 459.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionAuthoritative Source Selection — quality 8.65, 10.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Hypothesis Post Generation — quality 8.78, 847.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionContent To Image Prompt Generation — quality 8.86, 202.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReport Executive Summary Generation — quality 8.60, 134.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionFactual Claim Refinement — quality 8.63, 328.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionStructured Content Summarization — quality 8.36, 116.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionThematic Topic Discovery — quality 7.88, 10.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Query Generation — quality 7.73, 262.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionLanguage Identification — quality 9.90, 123.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPersona Policy Eligibility Check — quality 9.18, 175.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfile Pool Matching — quality 8.34, 156.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEngagement Opportunity Triage — quality 8.74, 243.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Section Assignment — quality 8.04, 120.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSocial Post Portfolio Selection — quality 8.60, 213.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCommunity Content Promotion Generation — quality 8.24, 25.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReference Preserving Analytical Writing — quality 8.86, 212.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMulti Perspective Decision Synthesis — quality 8.59, 60.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Cluster Labeling — quality 8.65, 99.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublication Title Package Generation — quality 9.12, 552.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Analysis — quality 8.75, 121.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCatalyst And Scenario Analysis — quality 8.26, 165.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough option

within ~1.3× of the best-value model · 1.3–2× · >2× · ★ this model is the best-value pick on that task. Top-right = best quadrant. Only tasks where this model qualifies at the 90% bar are plotted.

Per-task breakdown

TaskCategoryQuality (% of best)ConfidenceOverpay
Authoritative Source Selection bestRelevance, Classification & Matching100%RANKED10x
Thematic Topic DiscoveryTopic Organization & Clustering96%HIGH11x
Community Content Promotion GenerationSocial & Promotional Content96%MEDIUM26x
Multi Perspective Decision SynthesisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions97%RANKED61x
Topic Cluster LabelingTopic Organization & Clustering97%HIGH100x
Structured Content SummarizationContent Summarization & Synthesis93%HIGH117x
Topic Section AssignmentTopic Organization & Clustering98%MEDIUM120x
Profiled Document AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions98%MEDIUM122x
Language IdentificationRelevance, Classification & Matching98%HIGH123x
Report Executive Summary Generation bestContent Summarization & Synthesis100%RANKED134x
Profile Pool MatchingRelevance, Classification & Matching96%MEDIUM157x
Voice Profile GenerationLong-form Content Generation98%RANKED165x
Catalyst And Scenario AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions94%HIGH165x
Persona Policy Eligibility CheckRelevance, Classification & Matching100%MEDIUM175x
Content To Image Prompt GenerationInfrastructure & Utility100%RANKED203x
Reference Preserving Analytical WritingLong-form Content Generation96%MEDIUM213x
Social Post Portfolio SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching98%RANKED213x
Engagement Opportunity TriageRelevance, Classification & Matching98%RANKED243x
Research Query GenerationInfrastructure & Utility98%HIGH262x
Factual Claim Refinement bestInfrastructure & Utility100%MEDIUM329x
Batch Text TranslationInfrastructure & Utility96%MEDIUM460x
Research Query ValidationInfrastructure & Utility95%MEDIUM523x
Publication Title Package Generation bestContent Summarization & Synthesis100%RANKED552x
Promotional Message GenerationSocial & Promotional Content99%HIGH628x
Topic Sequence Optimization bestTopic Organization & Clustering100%HIGH719x
Public Response GenerationSocial & Promotional Content92%MEDIUM755x
Bench Hypothesis Post GenerationSocial & Promotional Content99%RANKED847x

Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that clears the quality bar on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.