Fronset Benchmark

Grok 4.6 (archived)

Provider
xAI
Model name
grok-4.6
Last benchmarked
Qualified on
23 / 53 tasks (at the 90% bar)
Best value on
0 tasks

Good enough on 23/53 tasks at the 90% bar. Best value on 0 tasks. Best fit for: Infrastructure & Utility, Long-form Content Generation, Relevance, Classification & Matching, Social & Promotional Content, Content Summarization & Synthesis, Topic Organization & Clustering.

Cost vs quality across all tasks, as of 24 September 2026

0%25%50%75%100%78910Quality score (7–10)Cost-efficiency vs best value (1.0 = best value)Reference Preserving Analytical Writing — quality 8.95, 5.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublication Title Package Generation — quality 8.99, 13.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReport Executive Summary Generation — quality 8.37, 7.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionShort Post Batch Relevance Scoring — quality 7.19, 37.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionVoice Profile Generation — quality 9.85, 22.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Section Analysis — quality 8.91, 47.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Cluster Labeling — quality 8.57, 16.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Section Assignment — quality 8.08, 56.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Query Validation — quality 8.01, 46.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Hypothesis Post Generation — quality 8.79, 173.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionThematic Topic Discovery — quality 8.02, 21.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSocial Post Portfolio Selection — quality 8.66, 160.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCommunity Content Promotion Generation — quality 8.27, 17.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfile Pool Matching — quality 8.41, 5.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMulti Perspective Decision Synthesis — quality 8.12, 26.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPersona Policy Eligibility Check — quality 8.78, 17.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Message Generation — quality 8.50, 72.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBatch Text Translation — quality 9.04, 91.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionAuthoritative Source Selection — quality 8.55, 39.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Article Hypothesis Generation — quality 8.66, 41.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionLanguage Identification — quality 9.67, 79.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEngagement Opportunity Triage — quality 8.60, 48.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionStructured Content Summarization — quality 8.44, 10.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough option

within ~1.3× of the best-value model · 1.3–2× · >2× · ★ this model is the best-value pick on that task. Top-right = best quadrant. Only tasks where this model qualifies at the 90% bar are plotted.

Per-task breakdown, as of 24 September 2026

TaskCategoryQuality (% of best)ConfidenceOverpay
Reference Preserving Analytical WritingLong-form Content Generation98%MEDIUM5.5x
Profile Pool MatchingRelevance, Classification & Matching95%MEDIUM5.5x
Report Executive Summary GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis96%HIGH7.1x
Structured Content SummarizationContent Summarization & Synthesis91%MEDIUM11x
Publication Title Package GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis98%RANKED14x
Topic Cluster LabelingTopic Organization & Clustering96%HIGH17x
Community Content Promotion GenerationSocial & Promotional Content96%MEDIUM18x
Persona Policy Eligibility CheckRelevance, Classification & Matching95%HIGH18x
Thematic Topic DiscoveryTopic Organization & Clustering94%MEDIUM21x
Voice Profile Generation bestLong-form Content Generation100%HIGH23x
Multi Perspective Decision SynthesisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions92%HIGH26x
Short Post Batch Relevance ScoringRelevance, Classification & Matching95%MEDIUM37x
Authoritative Source SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching98%RANKED40x
Bench Article Hypothesis GenerationEvidence-Grounded Hypothesis Generation96%MEDIUM42x
Research Query ValidationInfrastructure & Utility92%MEDIUM47x
Profiled Document Section AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions98%MEDIUM48x
Engagement Opportunity TriageRelevance, Classification & Matching97%RANKED48x
Topic Section AssignmentTopic Organization & Clustering93%MEDIUM57x
Promotional Message GenerationSocial & Promotional Content98%HIGH72x
Language IdentificationRelevance, Classification & Matching96%MEDIUM79x
Batch Text TranslationInfrastructure & Utility96%RANKED91x
Social Post Portfolio SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching99%HIGH160x
Bench Hypothesis Post GenerationSocial & Promotional Content96%HIGH173x

Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that clears the quality bar on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.