Fronset Benchmark

Gemini 3.5 Flash (archived)

Provider
Gemini
Model name
gemini-3.5-flash
Last benchmarked
Qualified on
36 / 53 tasks (at the 90% bar)
Best value on
1 tasks

Good enough on 36/53 tasks at the 90% bar. Best value on 1 task. Best fit for: Structured Data & Fact Extraction, Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions, Infrastructure & Utility, Long-form Content Generation, Relevance, Classification & Matching, Social & Promotional Content, Topic Organization & Clustering.

Cost vs quality across all tasks, as of 24 September 2026

0%25%50%75%100%78910Quality score (7–10)Cost-efficiency vs best value (1.0 = best value)Reference Preserving Analytical Writing — quality 8.55, 3.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionGenerated Content Relevance Scoring — quality 9.10, 4.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublication Title Package Generation — quality 8.65, 2.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionShort Post Batch Relevance Scoring — quality 7.57, 11.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Analysis — quality 8.70, 2.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionContent Set Relevance Scoring — quality 7.05, 2.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionVoice Profile Generation — quality 9.15, 12.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSubject Configuration Generation — quality 8.53, 10.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Section Analysis — quality 8.59, 18.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Cluster Labeling — quality 8.22, 5.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCommunity Policy Evaluation — quality 8.65, 13.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Section Assignment — quality 8.69, 18.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Structure Extraction — quality 9.50, 4.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Query Validation — quality 8.49, 13.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Hypothesis Post Generation — quality 8.95, 26.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionAtomic Fact Claim Extraction — quality 7.66, 14.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionContent To Image Prompt Generation — quality 8.69, 21.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSocial Post Portfolio Selection — quality 8.49, 37.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublic Response Generation — quality 7.76, 4.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Taxonomy Matching — quality 8.43, 3.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCommunity Content Promotion Generation — quality 8.64, 7.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionStructured Output Extraction — quality 9.78, 26.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMetadata Paragraph Rewriting — quality 9.10, 4.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfile Pool Matching — quality 8.31, 1.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCatalyst And Scenario Analysis — quality 8.78, 3.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMarkdown Newline Repair — quality 9.33, 38.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPersona Policy Eligibility Check — quality 9.09, 5.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Message Generation — quality 8.72, 11.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBatch Text Translation — quality 9.38, 23.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionFactual Claim Refinement — quality 8.31, 9.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Sequence Optimization — quality 8.98, 27.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Article Hypothesis Generation — quality 8.45, 23.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Community Selection — quality 7.30, 1.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionLanguage Identification — quality 9.98, 25.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEngagement Opportunity Triage — quality 8.59, 20.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Campaign Generation — quality 8.89, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★

within ~1.3× of the best-value model · 1.3–2× · >2× · ★ this model is the best-value pick on that task. Top-right = best quadrant. Only tasks where this model qualifies at the 90% bar are plotted.

Per-task breakdown, as of 24 September 2026

TaskCategoryQuality (% of best)ConfidenceOverpay
Promotional Campaign Generation ★ bestSocial & Promotional Content100%RANKEDbest value
Research Community SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching91%HIGH1.5x
Profile Pool MatchingRelevance, Classification & Matching94%MEDIUM1.9x
Profiled Document Analysis bestFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions100%RANKED2x
Publication Title Package GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis94%RANKED2.5x
Content Set Relevance Scoring bestRelevance, Classification & Matching100%HIGH2.7x
Catalyst And Scenario Analysis bestFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions100%RANKED3.1x
Topic Taxonomy MatchingRelevance, Classification & Matching100%RANKED3.2x
Reference Preserving Analytical WritingLong-form Content Generation93%HIGH3.3x
Metadata Paragraph RewritingInfrastructure & Utility97%HIGH4.2x
Public Response GenerationSocial & Promotional Content91%HIGH4.3x
Generated Content Relevance Scoring bestRelevance, Classification & Matching100%MEDIUM4.3x
Profiled Document Structure Extraction bestStructured Data & Fact Extraction100%HIGH4.5x
Topic Cluster LabelingTopic Organization & Clustering92%RANKED5x
Persona Policy Eligibility CheckRelevance, Classification & Matching99%RANKED5x
Community Content Promotion Generation bestSocial & Promotional Content100%RANKED7.9x
Factual Claim RefinementInfrastructure & Utility96%HIGH9.8x
Subject Configuration GenerationFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions96%RANKED10x
Short Post Batch Relevance Scoring bestRelevance, Classification & Matching100%MEDIUM11x
Promotional Message Generation bestSocial & Promotional Content100%RANKED12x
Voice Profile GenerationLong-form Content Generation93%RANKED12x
Research Query ValidationInfrastructure & Utility97%HIGH13x
Community Policy EvaluationRelevance, Classification & Matching93%MEDIUM14x
Atomic Fact Claim ExtractionStructured Data & Fact Extraction96%HIGH15x
Profiled Document Section AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions94%HIGH19x
Topic Section Assignment bestTopic Organization & Clustering100%MEDIUM19x
Engagement Opportunity TriageRelevance, Classification & Matching97%RANKED20x
Content To Image Prompt GenerationInfrastructure & Utility97%RANKED21x
Bench Article Hypothesis GenerationEvidence-Grounded Hypothesis Generation94%MEDIUM23x
Batch Text Translation bestInfrastructure & Utility100%HIGH24x
Language IdentificationRelevance, Classification & Matching99%RANKED26x
Bench Hypothesis Post GenerationSocial & Promotional Content97%RANKED26x
Structured Output Extraction bestStructured Data & Fact Extraction100%RANKED26x
Topic Sequence Optimization bestTopic Organization & Clustering100%HIGH27x
Social Post Portfolio SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching97%RANKED37x
Markdown Newline Repair bestInfrastructure & Utility100%RANKED38x

Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that clears the quality bar on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.