Cost mode:

Category: Structured Data & Fact Extraction · Typical I/O: 4331→710 tokens

Runs on model group: All models. Inputs may reach any model in the group, not only the ranked models below.

Run this task on Fronset — request an invitation

Models

Frontier on this task: Meta Muse Spark 1.3 at 8.87 / 10. Quality bar at 90%: 7.98.

point-estimate floor (CI low) · upper CI (less certain) · Bars sorted by blended cost; best-value model first. Greyed rows are MEDIUM+ models whose point estimate does not clear the bar.

ModelQuality scoreCI lowCost / 1k runsvs best value
Claude Haiku 5.58.46 / 108.14$0.35best value
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Super 120B8.68 / 108.29$0.932.6x more expensive
MiniMax M38.73 / 108.63$2.206.3x more expensive
Gemini 3.8 Flash8.65 / 108.27$3.5810x more expensive
Meta Muse Spark 1.38.87 / 108.64$11.0231x more expensive
Moonshot Kimi K38.08 / 107.75$20.6159x more expensive
Tencent Hy4 Preview8.64 / 108.33$24.3369x more expensive
Qwen 3.7 Plus7.72 / 107.39$1.143.2x more expensive
GPT-6 Sol7.93 / 107.59$3.379.6x more expensive
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash7.75 / 107.35$0.411.2x more expensive
GPT-6 Luna7.64 / 107.27$0.1847% cheaper
Claude Opus 5.57.95 / 107.62$11.0432x more expensive
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro7.86 / 107.49$0.692x more expensive
Grok 4.77.75 / 107.30$16.8948x more expensive
Claude Sonnet 5.57.69 / 107.30$5.3115x more expensive
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash7.77 / 107.46$0.2333% cheaper

Cost breakdown

ModelQualityConfidenceCost / 1k runsOverpayMode
Claude Haiku 5.5 ★ Anthropic8.46 / 10 CI [8.14, 8.79]MEDIUM$0.35best valuebatch
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Super 120B OpenRouter8.68 / 10 CI [8.29, 9.06]MEDIUM$0.932.6xbatch
MiniMax M3 OpenRouter8.73 / 10 CI [8.63, 8.83]RANKED$2.206.3xbatch
Gemini 3.8 Flash Gemini8.65 / 10 CI [8.27, 9.02]MEDIUM$3.5810xbatch
Meta Muse Spark 1.3 best OpenRouter8.87 / 10 CI [8.64, 9.10]HIGH$11.0231xbatch
Moonshot Kimi K3 Moonshot AI8.08 / 10 CI [7.75, 8.41]MEDIUM$20.6159xbatch
Tencent Hy4 Preview OpenRouter8.64 / 10 CI [8.33, 8.95]MEDIUM$24.3369xbatch

Overpay shows how much more you pay than the best-value model that clears the quality bar (marked ★) — the best-value good-enough option. "16x" means you overpay 16× — 16× that reference for no quality benefit above the bar. Typical call shape for this task: 4331 input tokens → 710 output tokens, EMA-tracked from production traffic. Cost is the observed, all-in $ per 1,000 task runs: each model's own measured usage on this task — output verbosity, thinking/reasoning tokens, cache reads and writes, and the spend on its billed failures — priced at current list rates and adjusted by the billing overhead we actually reconcile against provider invoices. Models that answer tersely cost what they actually cost; models that think at length pay for it. Not comparable to providers' advertised $/1M list rates — this is what running the task costs, not a per-token price.

Evaluation rubric

Judge heading and item recognition against the supplied document profile, hierarchy, order, amendment handling, fidelity to the sample, completeness, and resistance to inventing expected sections.

Output schema

Every answer on this task is checked against this JSON Schema, whichever model wrote it. An answer that doesn't fit counts as a model failure, and the call is retried on another model.

{
  "$defs": {
    "TOCChapter": {
      "description": "A chapter identified in the table of contents.",
      "properties": {
        "page_number": {
          "anyOf": [
            {
              "type": "integer"
            },
            {
              "type": "null"
            }
          ],
          "description": "Page number where the chapter starts, if available",
          "title": "Page Number"
        },
        "section_number": {
          "anyOf": [
            {
              "type": "string"
            },
            {
              "type": "null"
            }
          ],
          "description": "Section number (e.g., 'Item 1', 'Part I')",
          "title": "Section Number"
        },
        "title": {
          "description": "The full title of the chapter/section",
          "title": "Title",
          "type": "string"
        }
      },
      "required": [
        "title",
        "page_number",
        "section_number"
      ],
      "title": "TOCChapter",
      "type": "object"
    }
  },
  "description": "Table of contents extracted from S-1 filing.",
  "properties": {
    "chapters": {
      "description": "List of chapters/sections found in the table of contents",
      "items": {
        "$ref": "#/$defs/TOCChapter"
      },
      "title": "Chapters",
      "type": "array"
    },
    "document_type": {
      "description": "Type of document (S-1, S-1/A, etc.)",
      "title": "Document Type",
      "type": "string"
    },
    "toc_found": {
      "description": "Whether a clear table of contents was found",
      "title": "Toc Found",
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "chapters",
    "document_type",
    "toc_found"
  ],
  "title": "TableOfContents",
  "type": "object"
}

Prompt templates

The published template for this task.

default · LLMB_PROFILED_DOCUMENT_STRUCTURE_EXTRACTION_SYSTEM + LLMB_PROFILED_DOCUMENT_STRUCTURE_EXTRACTION_USER (45 calls in window)

System prompt

Identify only structure present in the supplied sample. Apply document_profile to recognize its declared document-family conventions, parts, items, numbering, amendments, and repeated headings while preserving labels and order. Do not insert a section merely because the profile says it is normally expected; mark incomplete samples explicitly. Use document_profile as the sole source of document-family assumptions. Treat empty optional values as absent and return only the requested result. Your response must conform exactly to this output schema: {schema_json_string}.

User prompt

Inputs — sample_text: {sample_text}; document_profile: {document_profile}. Use only these inputs to complete the task defined by the system prompt.