Fronset Benchmark

Moonshot Kimi K3 at a glance

Good enough on 37/54 tasks at the 90% bar. Best value on 0 tasks. Best fit for: Structured Data & Fact Extraction, Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions, Infrastructure & Utility, Relevance, Classifi

Provider
Moonshot AI
Model name
kimi-k3
Cost mode:
Qualifies on
37 / 54 tasks (at 90% bar)
Best value on
0 tasks

Cost vs quality across all tasks

0%25%50%75%100%678910Quality score (6–10)Cost-efficiency vs best value (1.0 = best value)Claim Continuity Classification — quality 8.66, 193.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublic Response Generation — quality 8.45, 169.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Campaign Generation — quality 7.78, 336.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Sequence Optimization — quality 8.48, 294.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionModel Specific Prompt Adaptation — quality 8.51, 138.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Message Generation — quality 8.57, 140.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSection Prompt Generation — quality 8.67, 82.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReport Outline Generation — quality 9.65, 12.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEvidence Grounded Claim Generation — quality 8.18, 103.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionAtomic Fact Claim Extraction — quality 7.57, 106.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionStructured Output Extraction — quality 9.60, 101.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBatch Text Translation — quality 9.25, 179.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionAuthoritative Source Selection — quality 8.06, 4.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Hypothesis Post Generation — quality 8.83, 172.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionContent To Image Prompt Generation — quality 8.65, 94.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReport Executive Summary Generation — quality 7.97, 63.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionStructured Content Summarization — quality 8.68, 97.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionThematic Topic Discovery — quality 7.65, 6.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublication Section Taxonomy Generation — quality 9.33, 2.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Query Generation — quality 7.80, 133.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionLanguage Identification — quality 10.04, 95.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Article Hypothesis Generation — quality 8.77, 14.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPersona Policy Eligibility Check — quality 9.20, 58.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEngagement Opportunity Triage — quality 8.84, 166.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSocial Post Portfolio Selection — quality 8.62, 184.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCommunity Content Promotion Generation — quality 8.03, 13.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Section Analysis — quality 8.95, 86.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReference Preserving Analytical Writing — quality 9.10, 67.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMulti Perspective Decision Synthesis — quality 8.84, 41.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Structure Extraction — quality 8.08, 58.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Cluster Labeling — quality 8.91, 53.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Region Identification — quality 8.84, 3.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublication Title Package Generation — quality 9.00, 180.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Analysis — quality 8.80, 49.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCatalyst And Scenario Analysis — quality 8.17, 100.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionShort Post Batch Relevance Scoring — quality 6.86, 63.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Taxonomy Matching — quality 8.42, 13.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough option

within ~1.3× of the best-value model · 1.3–2× · >2× · ★ this model is the best-value pick on that task. Top-right = best quadrant. Only tasks where this model qualifies at the 90% bar are plotted.

Per-task breakdown

TaskCategoryQuality (% of best)ConfidenceOverpay
Publication Section Taxonomy Generation bestLong-form Content Generation100%RANKED2.1x
Research Region Identification bestStructured Data & Fact Extraction100%HIGH3.1x
Authoritative Source SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching93%MEDIUM4.9x
Thematic Topic DiscoveryTopic Organization & Clustering94%MEDIUM6.4x
Report Outline Generation bestLong-form Content Generation100%RANKED12x
Community Content Promotion GenerationSocial & Promotional Content94%HIGH13x
Topic Taxonomy MatchingRelevance, Classification & Matching97%MEDIUM14x
Bench Article Hypothesis Generation bestEvidence-Grounded Hypothesis Generation100%HIGH15x
Multi Perspective Decision Synthesis bestFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions100%RANKED41x
Profiled Document AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions99%MEDIUM50x
Topic Cluster Labeling bestTopic Organization & Clustering100%RANKED54x
Persona Policy Eligibility Check bestRelevance, Classification & Matching100%HIGH58x
Profiled Document Structure ExtractionStructured Data & Fact Extraction91%MEDIUM59x
Short Post Batch Relevance ScoringRelevance, Classification & Matching94%MEDIUM63x
Report Executive Summary GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis93%HIGH64x
Reference Preserving Analytical WritingLong-form Content Generation99%RANKED67x
Section Prompt GenerationInfrastructure & Utility95%MEDIUM83x
Profiled Document Section AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions91%RANKED87x
Content To Image Prompt GenerationInfrastructure & Utility97%RANKED95x
Language IdentificationRelevance, Classification & Matching99%RANKED95x
Structured Content SummarizationContent Summarization & Synthesis97%HIGH97x
Catalyst And Scenario AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions93%MEDIUM100x
Structured Output ExtractionStructured Data & Fact Extraction97%MEDIUM102x
Evidence Grounded Claim GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis96%MEDIUM104x
Atomic Fact Claim ExtractionStructured Data & Fact Extraction93%MEDIUM106x
Research Query GenerationInfrastructure & Utility99%MEDIUM134x
Model Specific Prompt AdaptationInfrastructure & Utility95%MEDIUM138x
Promotional Message Generation bestSocial & Promotional Content100%RANKED141x
Engagement Opportunity TriageRelevance, Classification & Matching100%HIGH166x
Public Response Generation bestSocial & Promotional Content100%RANKED169x
Bench Hypothesis Post Generation bestSocial & Promotional Content100%HIGH172x
Batch Text Translation bestInfrastructure & Utility100%RANKED180x
Publication Title Package GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis99%RANKED181x
Social Post Portfolio SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching99%HIGH184x
Claim Continuity ClassificationRelevance, Classification & Matching99%HIGH194x
Topic Sequence OptimizationTopic Organization & Clustering96%MEDIUM295x
Promotional Campaign GenerationSocial & Promotional Content97%HIGH337x

Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that clears the quality bar on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.