Fronset Benchmark

Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro at a glance

Good enough on 20/54 tasks at the 90% bar. Best value on 0 tasks. Best fit for: Infrastructure & Utility, Relevance, Classification & Matching, Social & Promotional Content, Content Summarization & Sy

Provider
Xiaomi MiMo
Model name
mimo-v2.6-pro
Cost mode:
Qualifies on
20 / 54 tasks (at 90% bar)
Best value on
0 tasks

Cost vs quality across all tasks

0%25%50%75%100%678910Quality score (6–10)Cost-efficiency vs best value (1.0 = best value)Public Response Generation — quality 8.26, 3.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Sequence Optimization — quality 8.51, 4.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Message Generation — quality 7.82, 2.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCapability Category Matching — quality 8.83, 2.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEvidence Grounded Claim Generation — quality 7.93, 3.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionGenerated Content Relevance Scoring — quality 8.43, 1.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMetadata Paragraph Rewriting — quality 7.89, 3.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionStructured Output Extraction — quality 9.64, 3.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBatch Text Translation — quality 8.88, 3.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReport Executive Summary Generation — quality 8.07, 3.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Query Generation — quality 7.51, 2.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionLanguage Identification — quality 10.05, 6.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPersona Policy Eligibility Check — quality 8.76, 1.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEngagement Opportunity Triage — quality 8.72, 5.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionContent Set Relevance Scoring — quality 6.97, 1.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSocial Post Portfolio Selection — quality 8.43, 3.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReference Preserving Analytical Writing — quality 8.43, 2.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMulti Perspective Decision Synthesis — quality 7.96, 2.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublication Title Package Generation — quality 8.40, 2.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionShort Post Batch Relevance Scoring — quality 6.79, 3.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough option

within ~1.3× of the best-value model · 1.3–2× · >2× · ★ this model is the best-value pick on that task. Top-right = best quadrant. Only tasks where this model qualifies at the 90% bar are plotted.

Per-task breakdown

TaskCategoryQuality (% of best)ConfidenceOverpay
Generated Content Relevance ScoringRelevance, Classification & Matching94%MEDIUM1.4x
Persona Policy Eligibility CheckRelevance, Classification & Matching95%MEDIUM1.4x
Content Set Relevance Scoring bestRelevance, Classification & Matching100%MEDIUM1.4x
Reference Preserving Analytical WritingLong-form Content Generation91%MEDIUM2x
Multi Perspective Decision SynthesisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions90%MEDIUM2.1x
Research Query GenerationInfrastructure & Utility95%HIGH2.3x
Publication Title Package GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis92%MEDIUM2.4x
Promotional Message GenerationSocial & Promotional Content91%HIGH2.9x
Capability Category MatchingRelevance, Classification & Matching100%MEDIUM2.9x
Structured Output ExtractionStructured Data & Fact Extraction97%HIGH3x
Evidence Grounded Claim GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis93%HIGH3.3x
Report Executive Summary GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis94%HIGH3.5x
Short Post Batch Relevance ScoringRelevance, Classification & Matching93%MEDIUM3.5x
Social Post Portfolio SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching97%HIGH3.5x
Batch Text TranslationInfrastructure & Utility96%HIGH3.6x
Public Response GenerationSocial & Promotional Content98%MEDIUM3.7x
Metadata Paragraph RewritingInfrastructure & Utility94%RANKED3.9x
Topic Sequence OptimizationTopic Organization & Clustering96%HIGH4.5x
Engagement Opportunity TriageRelevance, Classification & Matching98%MEDIUM5.3x
Language IdentificationRelevance, Classification & Matching99%RANKED6.5x

Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that clears the quality bar on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.