Fronset Benchmark

Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash at a glance

Good enough on 16/54 tasks at the 90% bar. Best value on 14 tasks. Best fit for: Relevance, Classification & Matching, Topic Organization & Clustering. Doesn't qualify on any: Financial Analysis & Tra

Provider
Xiaomi MiMo
Model name
mimo-v2.6-flash
Cost mode:
Qualifies on
16 / 54 tasks (at 90% bar)
Best value on
14 tasks

Cost vs quality across all tasks

0%25%50%75%100%78910Quality score (7–10)Cost-efficiency vs best value (1.0 = best value)Claim Continuity Classification — quality 8.27, 4.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublic Response Generation — quality 7.65, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Topic Sequence Optimization — quality 8.17, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Promotional Message Generation — quality 7.88, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Capability Category Matching — quality 8.76, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Research Query Validation — quality 8.42, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Metadata Paragraph Rewriting — quality 7.81, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Structured Output Extraction — quality 9.77, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Batch Text Translation — quality 8.32, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Content To Image Prompt Generation — quality 8.48, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Language Identification — quality 10.14, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Profile Pool Matching — quality 8.17, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Engagement Opportunity Triage — quality 8.33, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Social Post Portfolio Selection — quality 8.71, 1.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Cluster Labeling — quality 8.28, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Publication Title Package Generation — quality 8.41, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★

within ~1.3× of the best-value model · 1.3–2× · >2× · ★ this model is the best-value pick on that task. Top-right = best quadrant. Only tasks where this model qualifies at the 90% bar are plotted.

Per-task breakdown

TaskCategoryQuality (% of best)ConfidenceOverpay
Topic Cluster Labeling ★Topic Organization & Clustering93%MEDIUMbest value
Profile Pool Matching ★Relevance, Classification & Matching94%MEDIUMbest value
Language Identification ★ bestRelevance, Classification & Matching100%MEDIUMbest value
Batch Text Translation ★Infrastructure & Utility90%MEDIUMbest value
Metadata Paragraph Rewriting ★Infrastructure & Utility94%HIGHbest value
Capability Category Matching ★Relevance, Classification & Matching99%MEDIUMbest value
Public Response Generation ★Social & Promotional Content90%MEDIUMbest value
Structured Output Extraction ★Structured Data & Fact Extraction98%HIGHbest value
Promotional Message Generation ★Social & Promotional Content92%MEDIUMbest value
Publication Title Package Generation ★Content Summarization & Synthesis92%HIGHbest value
Engagement Opportunity Triage ★Relevance, Classification & Matching94%MEDIUMbest value
Content To Image Prompt Generation ★Infrastructure & Utility95%RANKEDbest value
Research Query Validation ★Infrastructure & Utility97%MEDIUMbest value
Topic Sequence Optimization ★Topic Organization & Clustering92%HIGHbest value
Social Post Portfolio SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching100%RANKED1.4x
Claim Continuity ClassificationRelevance, Classification & Matching95%MEDIUM4.8x

Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that clears the quality bar on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.