Fronset Benchmark

Meta Muse Spark 1.3 at a glance

Good enough on 34/54 tasks at the 90% bar. Best value on 0 tasks. Best fit for: Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions, Infrastructure & Utility, Relevance, Classification & Matching, Content Summariz

Provider
OpenRouter
Model name
meta/muse-spark-1.3
Cost mode:
Qualifies on
34 / 54 tasks (at 90% bar)
Best value on
0 tasks

Cost vs quality across all tasks

0%25%50%75%100%678910Quality score (6–10)Cost-efficiency vs best value (1.0 = best value)Claim Continuity Classification — quality 8.22, 37.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionVoice Profile Generation — quality 9.66, 33.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Sequence Optimization — quality 8.06, 74.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionModel Specific Prompt Adaptation — quality 8.64, 70.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Message Generation — quality 8.07, 78.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSection Prompt Generation — quality 8.59, 27.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEvidence Grounded Claim Generation — quality 8.03, 23.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Query Validation — quality 8.68, 89.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMetadata Paragraph Rewriting — quality 7.54, 119.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBatch Text Translation — quality 8.91, 55.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionAuthoritative Source Selection — quality 8.26, 2.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Hypothesis Post Generation — quality 8.68, 69.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionContent To Image Prompt Generation — quality 8.16, 67.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionFactual Claim Refinement — quality 8.42, 46.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionStructured Content Summarization — quality 8.97, 67.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionThematic Topic Discovery — quality 7.40, 2.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Query Generation — quality 7.62, 62.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionLanguage Identification — quality 9.88, 129.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Article Hypothesis Generation — quality 8.66, 3.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPersona Policy Eligibility Check — quality 8.97, 35.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfile Pool Matching — quality 8.50, 46.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Section Assignment — quality 7.60, 36.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSocial Post Portfolio Selection — quality 8.73, 93.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Section Analysis — quality 8.88, 41.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Community Selection — quality 7.78, 6.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMulti Perspective Decision Synthesis — quality 8.13, 19.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Structure Extraction — quality 8.87, 31.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Cluster Labeling — quality 8.17, 31.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublication Title Package Generation — quality 8.63, 46.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionVisual Theme Configuration Generation — quality 8.64, 44.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Analysis — quality 8.74, 9.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCatalyst And Scenario Analysis — quality 7.98, 27.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionShort Post Batch Relevance Scoring — quality 6.95, 29.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Taxonomy Matching — quality 8.15, 4.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough option

within ~1.3× of the best-value model · 1.3–2× · >2× · ★ this model is the best-value pick on that task. Top-right = best quadrant. Only tasks where this model qualifies at the 90% bar are plotted.

Per-task breakdown

TaskCategoryQuality (% of best)ConfidenceOverpay
Authoritative Source SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching95%RANKED2x
Thematic Topic DiscoveryTopic Organization & Clustering90%MEDIUM2.6x
Bench Article Hypothesis GenerationEvidence-Grounded Hypothesis Generation99%RANKED3.7x
Topic Taxonomy MatchingRelevance, Classification & Matching93%MEDIUM4.9x
Research Community Selection bestRelevance, Classification & Matching100%HIGH6.5x
Profiled Document AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions98%HIGH9.2x
Multi Perspective Decision SynthesisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions92%RANKED20x
Evidence Grounded Claim GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis94%HIGH23x
Catalyst And Scenario AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions91%HIGH28x
Section Prompt GenerationInfrastructure & Utility94%MEDIUM28x
Short Post Batch Relevance ScoringRelevance, Classification & Matching95%MEDIUM29x
Topic Cluster LabelingTopic Organization & Clustering92%HIGH31x
Profiled Document Structure Extraction bestStructured Data & Fact Extraction100%HIGH31x
Voice Profile Generation bestLong-form Content Generation100%HIGH34x
Persona Policy Eligibility CheckRelevance, Classification & Matching97%HIGH36x
Topic Section AssignmentTopic Organization & Clustering93%MEDIUM36x
Claim Continuity ClassificationRelevance, Classification & Matching94%RANKED38x
Profiled Document Section AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions90%HIGH41x
Visual Theme Configuration GenerationLong-form Content Generation97%MEDIUM45x
Publication Title Package GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis95%RANKED46x
Profile Pool MatchingRelevance, Classification & Matching98%MEDIUM46x
Factual Claim RefinementInfrastructure & Utility98%MEDIUM47x
Batch Text TranslationInfrastructure & Utility96%RANKED55x
Research Query GenerationInfrastructure & Utility97%HIGH63x
Structured Content Summarization bestContent Summarization & Synthesis100%RANKED67x
Content To Image Prompt GenerationInfrastructure & Utility92%HIGH68x
Bench Hypothesis Post GenerationSocial & Promotional Content98%RANKED69x
Model Specific Prompt AdaptationInfrastructure & Utility97%MEDIUM71x
Topic Sequence OptimizationTopic Organization & Clustering91%HIGH74x
Promotional Message GenerationSocial & Promotional Content94%MEDIUM79x
Research Query Validation bestInfrastructure & Utility100%HIGH89x
Social Post Portfolio Selection bestRelevance, Classification & Matching100%RANKED94x
Metadata Paragraph RewritingInfrastructure & Utility90%MEDIUM119x
Language IdentificationRelevance, Classification & Matching97%HIGH129x

Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that clears the quality bar on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.