Fronset Benchmark

Qwen 3.8 Max at a glance

Good enough on 20/54 tasks at the 90% bar. Best value on 0 tasks. Best fit for: Content Summarization & Synthesis.

Provider
Alibaba Cloud (DashScope)
Model name
qwen3.8-max
Cost mode:
Qualifies on
20 / 54 tasks (at 90% bar)
Best value on
0 tasks

Cost vs quality across all tasks

0%25%50%75%100%78910Quality score (7–10)Cost-efficiency vs best value (1.0 = best value)Voice Profile Generation — quality 9.38, 163.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Sequence Optimization — quality 8.07, 442.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Message Generation — quality 7.77, 205.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEvidence Grounded Claim Generation — quality 8.16, 106.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Query Validation — quality 8.54, 231.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMetadata Paragraph Rewriting — quality 7.59, 259.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionStructured Output Extraction — quality 9.34, 191.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBatch Text Translation — quality 8.46, 237.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Hypothesis Post Generation — quality 8.72, 240.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionContent To Image Prompt Generation — quality 8.42, 130.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReport Executive Summary Generation — quality 8.35, 92.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionStructured Content Summarization — quality 8.20, 117.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionLanguage Identification — quality 10.06, 82.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Article Hypothesis Generation — quality 8.05, 10.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEngagement Opportunity Triage — quality 8.47, 130.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Section Assignment — quality 8.06, 43.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSocial Post Portfolio Selection — quality 8.15, 179.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Community Selection — quality 7.18, 23.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMulti Perspective Decision Synthesis — quality 7.99, 36.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Analysis — quality 8.49, 35.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough option

within ~1.3× of the best-value model · 1.3–2× · >2× · ★ this model is the best-value pick on that task. Top-right = best quadrant. Only tasks where this model qualifies at the 90% bar are plotted.

Per-task breakdown

TaskCategoryQuality (% of best)ConfidenceOverpay
Bench Article Hypothesis GenerationEvidence-Grounded Hypothesis Generation92%MEDIUM10x
Research Community SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching92%MEDIUM24x
Profiled Document AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions95%MEDIUM36x
Multi Perspective Decision SynthesisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions90%HIGH37x
Topic Section AssignmentTopic Organization & Clustering98%MEDIUM43x
Language IdentificationRelevance, Classification & Matching99%RANKED83x
Report Executive Summary GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis97%HIGH92x
Evidence Grounded Claim GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis96%MEDIUM106x
Structured Content SummarizationContent Summarization & Synthesis91%MEDIUM117x
Engagement Opportunity TriageRelevance, Classification & Matching95%RANKED130x
Content To Image Prompt GenerationInfrastructure & Utility95%RANKED130x
Voice Profile GenerationLong-form Content Generation97%HIGH163x
Social Post Portfolio SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching93%RANKED180x
Structured Output ExtractionStructured Data & Fact Extraction94%MEDIUM192x
Promotional Message GenerationSocial & Promotional Content91%MEDIUM205x
Research Query ValidationInfrastructure & Utility98%MEDIUM232x
Batch Text TranslationInfrastructure & Utility91%MEDIUM238x
Bench Hypothesis Post GenerationSocial & Promotional Content99%RANKED240x
Metadata Paragraph RewritingInfrastructure & Utility91%HIGH259x
Topic Sequence OptimizationTopic Organization & Clustering91%MEDIUM443x

Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that clears the quality bar on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.