Fronset Benchmark

GPT-5.6 Sol (archived)

Provider
OpenAI
Model name
gpt-5.6-sol
Last benchmarked
Qualified on
30 / 53 tasks (at the 90% bar)
Best value on
0 tasks

Good enough on 30/53 tasks at the 90% bar. Best value on 0 tasks. Best fit for: Structured Data & Fact Extraction, Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions, Infrastructure & Utility, Long-form Content Generation, Relevance, Classification & Matching, Social & Promotional Content, Topic Organization & Clustering.

Cost vs quality across all tasks, as of 24 September 2026

0%25%50%75%100%678910Quality score (6–10)Cost-efficiency vs best value (1.0 = best value)Reference Preserving Analytical Writing — quality 8.63, 2.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionGenerated Content Relevance Scoring — quality 8.99, 12.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionModel Specific Prompt Adaptation — quality 8.58, 2.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Analysis — quality 8.37, 2.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionContent Set Relevance Scoring — quality 6.91, 4.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionVoice Profile Generation — quality 9.12, 15.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Section Analysis — quality 8.89, 29.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Cluster Labeling — quality 8.34, 8.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCommunity Policy Evaluation — quality 9.24, 12.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Section Assignment — quality 8.26, 87.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Structure Extraction — quality 9.06, 2.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Hypothesis Post Generation — quality 8.95, 20.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionContent To Image Prompt Generation — quality 8.99, 16.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionThematic Topic Discovery — quality 8.49, 18.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSocial Post Portfolio Selection — quality 8.48, 18.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublic Response Generation — quality 8.53, 3.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Taxonomy Matching — quality 8.35, 2.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionVisual Theme Configuration Generation — quality 9.08, 19.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionStructured Output Extraction — quality 9.74, 24.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMulti Perspective Decision Synthesis — quality 8.12, 17.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPersona Policy Eligibility Check — quality 9.04, 4.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Message Generation — quality 8.52, 9.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBatch Text Translation — quality 8.93, 21.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionAuthoritative Source Selection — quality 8.76, 22.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSection Prompt Generation — quality 8.56, 20.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Article Hypothesis Generation — quality 8.75, 15.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionLanguage Identification — quality 9.99, 20.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEngagement Opportunity Triage — quality 8.43, 20.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Query Generation — quality 8.15, 17.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionStructured Content Summarization — quality 8.84, 15.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough option

within ~1.3× of the best-value model · 1.3–2× · >2× · ★ this model is the best-value pick on that task. Top-right = best quadrant. Only tasks where this model qualifies at the 90% bar are plotted.

Per-task breakdown, as of 24 September 2026

TaskCategoryQuality (% of best)ConfidenceOverpay
Profiled Document AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions96%MEDIUM2x
Topic Taxonomy MatchingRelevance, Classification & Matching99%HIGH2.7x
Model Specific Prompt AdaptationInfrastructure & Utility96%RANKED2.7x
Reference Preserving Analytical WritingLong-form Content Generation94%MEDIUM2.7x
Profiled Document Structure ExtractionStructured Data & Fact Extraction95%MEDIUM2.8x
Public Response GenerationSocial & Promotional Content100%RANKED3.6x
Persona Policy Eligibility CheckRelevance, Classification & Matching98%RANKED4.2x
Content Set Relevance ScoringRelevance, Classification & Matching98%MEDIUM4.3x
Topic Cluster LabelingTopic Organization & Clustering94%MEDIUM8.3x
Promotional Message GenerationSocial & Promotional Content98%RANKED9.8x
Generated Content Relevance ScoringRelevance, Classification & Matching99%MEDIUM12x
Community Policy EvaluationRelevance, Classification & Matching100%MEDIUM12x
Bench Article Hypothesis GenerationEvidence-Grounded Hypothesis Generation97%HIGH15x
Voice Profile GenerationLong-form Content Generation93%RANKED15x
Structured Content SummarizationContent Summarization & Synthesis96%HIGH16x
Content To Image Prompt Generation bestInfrastructure & Utility100%RANKED16x
Multi Perspective Decision SynthesisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions92%HIGH18x
Research Query GenerationInfrastructure & Utility100%HIGH18x
Thematic Topic Discovery bestTopic Organization & Clustering100%HIGH18x
Social Post Portfolio SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching97%RANKED19x
Visual Theme Configuration GenerationLong-form Content Generation97%HIGH19x
Language IdentificationRelevance, Classification & Matching99%RANKED20x
Engagement Opportunity TriageRelevance, Classification & Matching95%HIGH20x
Section Prompt Generation bestInfrastructure & Utility100%MEDIUM20x
Bench Hypothesis Post GenerationSocial & Promotional Content97%RANKED21x
Batch Text TranslationInfrastructure & Utility95%RANKED22x
Authoritative Source Selection bestRelevance, Classification & Matching100%RANKED22x
Structured Output ExtractionStructured Data & Fact Extraction100%RANKED24x
Profiled Document Section AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions97%RANKED29x
Topic Section AssignmentTopic Organization & Clustering95%MEDIUM87x

Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that clears the quality bar on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.