Cost mode:

Category: Long-form Content Generation · Typical I/O: 1147→1785 tokens

Runs on model group: All models. Inputs may reach any model in the group, not only the ranked models below.

Run this task on Fronset — request an invitation

Models

Frontier on this task: Meta Muse Spark 1.3 at 9.58 / 10. Quality bar at 90%: 8.63.

point-estimate floor (CI low) · upper CI (less certain) · Bars sorted by blended cost; best-value model first. Greyed rows are MEDIUM+ models whose point estimate does not clear the bar.

ModelQuality scoreCI lowCost / 1k runsvs best value
GPT-6 Luna8.91 / 108.70$0.69best value
Claude Haiku 5.58.80 / 108.59$0.701x more expensive
MiniMax M39.37 / 109.33$1.412x more expensive
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash9.11 / 108.93$1.652.4x more expensive
Gemini 3.8 Flash9.10 / 108.93$4.005.8x more expensive
Thinking Machines Inkling Small8.65 / 108.25$4.166x more expensive
GPT-6 Sol9.09 / 108.87$7.3311x more expensive
Qwen 3.7 Plus8.95 / 108.85$8.5112x more expensive
GLM-5.3 Flash9.56 / 109.40$8.5712x more expensive
Claude Sonnet 5.58.98 / 108.74$10.3615x more expensive
Meta Muse Spark 1.39.58 / 109.36$11.5717x more expensive
Thinking Machines Inkling8.94 / 108.70$13.2219x more expensive
Claude Opus 5.58.88 / 108.57$22.5933x more expensive
Tencent Hy4 Preview9.47 / 109.32$32.4047x more expensive
Grok 4.79.19 / 109.01$38.3356x more expensive
Qwen 3.8 Max9.37 / 109.17$62.2590x more expensive
GLM-5.39.48 / 109.32$65.1594x more expensive
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B7.88 / 107.53$0.5521% cheaper
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash7.82 / 107.44$0.2269% cheaper
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite7.73 / 107.45$1.011.5x more expensive
Tencent Hy37.86 / 107.58$0.4929% cheaper
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Ultra 550B7.79 / 107.31$3.605.2x more expensive
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Super 120B8.27 / 108.03$0.891.3x more expensive
Qwen 3.8 Flash8.38 / 107.97$3.785.5x more expensive
Moonshot Kimi K38.30 / 107.87$61.6589x more expensive

Cost breakdown

ModelQualityConfidenceCost / 1k runsOverpayMode
GPT-6 Luna ★ OpenAI8.91 / 10 CI [8.70, 9.13]HIGH$0.69best valuebatch
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic8.80 / 10 CI [8.59, 9.01]HIGH$0.701xbatch
MiniMax M3 OpenRouter9.37 / 10 CI [9.33, 9.41]RANKED$1.412xbatch
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek9.11 / 10 CI [8.93, 9.29]RANKED$1.652.4xbatch
Gemini 3.8 Flash Gemini9.10 / 10 CI [8.93, 9.28]RANKED$4.005.8xbatch
Thinking Machines Inkling Small OpenRouter8.65 / 10 CI [8.25, 9.04]MEDIUM$4.166xbatch
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI9.09 / 10 CI [8.87, 9.32]HIGH$7.3311xbatch
Qwen 3.7 Plus Alibaba Cloud (DashScope)8.95 / 10 CI [8.85, 9.06]RANKED$8.5112xbatch
GLM-5.3 Flash Z.AI9.56 / 10 CI [9.40, 9.72]RANKED$8.5712xbatch
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic8.98 / 10 CI [8.74, 9.21]HIGH$10.3615xbatch
Meta Muse Spark 1.3 best OpenRouter9.58 / 10 CI [9.36, 9.80]HIGH$11.5717xbatch
Thinking Machines Inkling OpenRouter8.94 / 10 CI [8.70, 9.18]HIGH$13.2219xbatch
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic8.88 / 10 CI [8.57, 9.19]MEDIUM$22.5933xbatch
Tencent Hy4 Preview OpenRouter9.47 / 10 CI [9.32, 9.63]RANKED$32.4047xbatch
Grok 4.7 xAI9.19 / 10 CI [9.01, 9.37]RANKED$38.3356xbatch
Qwen 3.8 Max Alibaba Cloud (DashScope)9.37 / 10 CI [9.17, 9.58]HIGH$62.2590xbatch
GLM-5.3 Z.AI9.48 / 10 CI [9.32, 9.63]RANKED$65.1594xbatch

Overpay shows how much more you pay than the best-value model that clears the quality bar (marked ★) — the best-value good-enough option. "16x" means you overpay 16× — 16× that reference for no quality benefit above the bar. Typical call shape for this task: 1147 input tokens → 1785 output tokens, EMA-tracked from production traffic. Cost is the observed, all-in $ per 1,000 task runs: each model's own measured usage on this task — output verbosity, thinking/reasoning tokens, cache reads and writes, and the spend on its billed failures — priced at current list rates and adjusted by the billing overhead we actually reconcile against provider invoices. Models that answer tersely cost what they actually cost; models that think at length pay for it. Not comparable to providers' advertised $/1M list rates — this is what running the task costs, not a per-token price.

Evaluation rubric

Judge usability as a writing specification, internal consistency, grounding in supplied inputs, distinctiveness without caricature, clear expertise boundaries, and safety around identity claims. Penalize generic adjective lists and invented biography.

Output schema

Every answer on this task is checked against this JSON Schema, whichever model wrote it. An answer that doesn't fit counts as a model failure, and the call is retried on another model.

{
  "description": "Output model for author soul generation.",
  "properties": {
    "soul": {
      "description": "Markdown document capturing the author's voice, perspective, writing style, rhetorical habits, vocabulary tendencies, emotional register, and structural preferences.",
      "title": "Soul",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "soul"
  ],
  "title": "AuthorSoulOutput",
  "type": "object"
}

Prompt templates

The published template for this task.

default · LLMB_VOICE_PROFILE_GENERATION_SYSTEM + LLMB_VOICE_PROFILE_GENERATION_USER (0 calls in window)

System prompt

Create an operational voice profile that a separate writing model can follow. Describe worldview, expertise boundaries, rhetorical habits, tone, vocabulary, structure, and behaviors to avoid. Ground biographical claims only in supplied material; distinguish factual background from creative voice guidance. Do not instruct the persona to impersonate a living person or make false first-person claims. Treat empty optional values as absent and return only the requested result. Your response must conform exactly to this output schema: {schema_json_string}.

User prompt

Inputs — author_name: {author_name}; biography: {biography}; expertise_areas: {expertise_areas}; writing_style: {writing_style}; content_themes: {content_themes}; interests: {interests}; voice_profile: {voice_profile}. Use only these inputs to complete the task defined by the system prompt.