Cost mode:

Category: Social & Promotional Content · Typical I/O: 2930→3242 tokens

Runs on model group: All models. Inputs may reach any model in the group, not only the ranked models below.

Run this task on Fronset — request an invitation

Models

Frontier on this task: Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro at 8.48 / 10. Quality bar at 90%: 7.63.

point-estimate floor (CI low) · upper CI (less certain) · Bars sorted by blended cost; best-value model first. Greyed rows are MEDIUM+ models whose point estimate does not clear the bar.

ModelQuality scoreCI lowCost / 1k runsvs best value
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash7.87 / 107.44$0.24best value
Claude Haiku 5.57.64 / 107.17$0.451.9x more expensive
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro8.48 / 108.16$0.933.9x more expensive
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash7.85 / 107.46$0.964.1x more expensive
Tencent Hy37.84 / 107.56$2.129x more expensive
GPT-6 Sol7.65 / 107.25$3.9117x more expensive
Thinking Machines Inkling Small8.06 / 107.76$7.4431x more expensive
Claude Sonnet 5.57.92 / 107.54$7.4732x more expensive
Claude Opus 5.57.77 / 107.38$15.4165x more expensive
Thinking Machines Inkling7.86 / 107.55$27.04114x more expensive
Moonshot Kimi K38.41 / 108.24$45.28192x more expensive
Grok 4.77.85 / 107.46$49.28208x more expensive
GLM-5.37.83 / 107.51$178.15754x more expensive
GPT-6 Luna7.42 / 106.95$0.371.6x more expensive
GLM-5.3 Flash7.58 / 107.09$14.9563x more expensive
Qwen 3.8 Flash7.30 / 106.83$4.9121x more expensive
Gemini 3.8 Flash6.99 / 106.61$3.5715x more expensive
Tencent Hy4 Preview7.35 / 106.90$41.82177x more expensive
Qwen 3.8 Max7.24 / 106.77$65.52277x more expensive
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B5.90 / 105.44$0.933.9x more expensive
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite6.46 / 106.03$0.652.7x more expensive
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Super 120B6.37 / 105.95$1.375.8x more expensive
Qwen 3.7 Plus7.63 / 107.35$8.2635x more expensive
MiniMax M37.39 / 107.02$4.8420x more expensive

Cost breakdown

ModelQualityConfidenceCost / 1k runsOverpayMode
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash ★ Xiaomi MiMo7.87 / 10 CI [7.44, 8.29]MEDIUM$0.24best valuebatch
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic7.64 / 10 CI [7.17, 8.11]MEDIUM$0.451.9xbatch
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro best Xiaomi MiMo8.48 / 10 CI [8.16, 8.80]MEDIUM$0.933.9xbatch
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek7.85 / 10 CI [7.46, 8.23]MEDIUM$0.964.1xbatch
Tencent Hy3 OpenRouter7.84 / 10 CI [7.56, 8.13]HIGH$2.129xbatch
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI7.65 / 10 CI [7.25, 8.04]MEDIUM$3.9117xbatch
Thinking Machines Inkling Small OpenRouter8.06 / 10 CI [7.76, 8.37]MEDIUM$7.4431xbatch
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic7.92 / 10 CI [7.54, 8.29]MEDIUM$7.4732xbatch
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic7.77 / 10 CI [7.38, 8.16]MEDIUM$15.4165xbatch
Thinking Machines Inkling OpenRouter7.86 / 10 CI [7.55, 8.16]MEDIUM$27.04114xbatch
Moonshot Kimi K3 Moonshot AI8.41 / 10 CI [8.24, 8.59]RANKED$45.28192xbatch
Grok 4.7 xAI7.85 / 10 CI [7.46, 8.24]MEDIUM$49.28208xbatch
GLM-5.3 Z.AI7.83 / 10 CI [7.51, 8.16]MEDIUM$178.15754xbatch

Overpay shows how much more you pay than the best-value model that clears the quality bar (marked ★) — the best-value good-enough option. "16x" means you overpay 16× — 16× that reference for no quality benefit above the bar. Typical call shape for this task: 2930 input tokens → 3242 output tokens, EMA-tracked from production traffic. Cost is the observed, all-in $ per 1,000 task runs: each model's own measured usage on this task — output verbosity, thinking/reasoning tokens, cache reads and writes, and the spend on its billed failures — priced at current list rates and adjusted by the billing overhead we actually reconcile against provider invoices. Models that answer tersely cost what they actually cost; models that think at length pay for it. Not comparable to providers' advertised $/1M list rates — this is what running the task costs, not a per-token price.

Evaluation rubric

Judge direct relevance, evidence grounding, compliance with allowed and forbidden claims, conversational value, tone, platform fit, and appropriate abstention. Penalize generic compliments, self-promotion, and unsupported comparative claims.

Output schema

Every answer on this task is checked against this JSON Schema, whichever model wrote it. An answer that doesn't fit counts as a model failure, and the call is retried on another model.

{
  "description": "A drafted public reply for an engage-decision candidate.",
  "properties": {
    "reply_text": {
      "description": "The reply, in the persona voice. Put the literal token \u003cLINK\u003e where a tracked Fronset benchmark link belongs (only if genuinely useful).",
      "title": "Reply Text",
      "type": "string"
    },
    "uses_link": {
      "default": false,
      "description": "True if the reply includes the \u003cLINK\u003e token.",
      "title": "Uses Link",
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "reply_text"
  ],
  "title": "EngagementReplyDraft",
  "type": "object"
}

Prompt templates

The published template for this task.

default · LLMB_PUBLIC_RESPONSE_GENERATION_SYSTEM + LLMB_PUBLIC_RESPONSE_GENERATION_USER (220 calls in window)

System prompt

Respond directly to the supplied message and add genuine conversational value. Use only allowed evidence, respect forbidden claims, and apply channel_profile, policy_profile, and voice_profile as the complete source of length, tone, formatting, safety, and release behavior. If the evidence cannot support the requested angle, return the schema-defined abstention. Treat empty optional values as absent and return only the requested result. Your response must conform exactly to this output schema: {schema_json_string}.

User prompt

Inputs — operator_instructions: {operator_instructions}; platform: {platform}; max_length: {max_length}; author_handle: {author_handle}; post_text: {post_text}; angle: {angle}; approved_claims: {approved_claims}; forbidden_claims: {forbidden_claims}; covered_models: {covered_models}; journal_articles: {journal_articles}; model_ranking: {model_ranking}; bench_claims: {bench_claims}; channel_profile: {channel_profile}; policy_profile: {policy_profile}; voice_profile: {voice_profile}. Use only these inputs to complete the task defined by the system prompt.