Cost mode:

Category: Content Summarization & Synthesis · Typical I/O: 51789→5111 tokens

Runs on model group: All models. Inputs may reach any model in the group, not only the ranked models below.

Run this task on Fronset — request an invitation

Models

Frontier on this task: GLM-5.3 at 8.61 / 10. Quality bar at 90%: 7.75.

point-estimate floor (CI low) · upper CI (less certain) · Bars sorted by blended cost; best-value model first. Greyed rows are MEDIUM+ models whose point estimate does not clear the bar.

ModelQuality scoreCI lowCost / 1k runsvs best value
Claude Haiku 5.57.75 / 107.50$4.06best value
GPT-6 Luna8.11 / 107.82$4.381.1x more expensive
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro8.07 / 107.84$7.881.9x more expensive
Gemini 3.8 Flash8.00 / 107.71$24.396x more expensive
Qwen 3.7 Plus8.19 / 107.99$25.556.3x more expensive
GLM-5.3 Flash8.34 / 108.03$29.697.3x more expensive
GPT-6 Sol8.21 / 107.88$48.1512x more expensive
Meta Muse Spark 1.37.94 / 107.53$63.8716x more expensive
Tencent Hy4 Preview7.87 / 107.41$71.0417x more expensive
Claude Sonnet 5.58.11 / 107.82$75.6619x more expensive
Grok 4.78.15 / 107.90$124.2231x more expensive
Moonshot Kimi K37.98 / 107.75$152.4738x more expensive
Claude Opus 5.58.28 / 108.04$157.9439x more expensive
Qwen 3.8 Max8.35 / 108.06$191.1547x more expensive
GLM-5.38.61 / 108.43$286.7471x more expensive
Thinking Machines Inkling Small7.70 / 107.36$24.326x more expensive
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash7.49 / 107.06$6.491.6x more expensive
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite6.90 / 106.43$7.541.9x more expensive
MiniMax M37.62 / 107.46$21.975.4x more expensive
Thinking Machines Inkling7.68 / 107.34$59.9715x more expensive

Cost breakdown

ModelQualityConfidenceCost / 1k runsOverpayMode
Claude Haiku 5.5 ★ Anthropic7.75 / 10 CI [7.50, 8.00]HIGH$4.06best valuebatch
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI8.11 / 10 CI [7.82, 8.41]HIGH$4.381.1xbatch
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro Xiaomi MiMo8.07 / 10 CI [7.84, 8.30]HIGH$7.881.9xbatch
Gemini 3.8 Flash Gemini8.00 / 10 CI [7.71, 8.28]HIGH$24.396xbatch
Qwen 3.7 Plus Alibaba Cloud (DashScope)8.19 / 10 CI [7.99, 8.39]RANKED$25.556.3xbatch
GLM-5.3 Flash Z.AI8.34 / 10 CI [8.03, 8.64]MEDIUM$29.697.3xbatch
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI8.21 / 10 CI [7.88, 8.54]MEDIUM$48.1512xbatch
Meta Muse Spark 1.3 OpenRouter7.94 / 10 CI [7.53, 8.36]MEDIUM$63.8716xbatch
Tencent Hy4 Preview OpenRouter7.87 / 10 CI [7.41, 8.34]MEDIUM$71.0417xbatch
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic8.11 / 10 CI [7.82, 8.39]HIGH$75.6619xbatch
Grok 4.7 xAI8.15 / 10 CI [7.90, 8.41]HIGH$124.2231xbatch
Moonshot Kimi K3 Moonshot AI7.98 / 10 CI [7.75, 8.22]HIGH$152.4738xbatch
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic8.28 / 10 CI [8.04, 8.51]HIGH$157.9439xbatch
Qwen 3.8 Max Alibaba Cloud (DashScope)8.35 / 10 CI [8.06, 8.63]HIGH$191.1547xbatch
GLM-5.3 best Z.AI8.61 / 10 CI [8.43, 8.79]RANKED$286.7471xbatch

Overpay shows how much more you pay than the best-value model that clears the quality bar (marked ★) — the best-value good-enough option. "16x" means you overpay 16× — 16× that reference for no quality benefit above the bar. Typical call shape for this task: 51789 input tokens → 5111 output tokens, EMA-tracked from production traffic. Cost is the observed, all-in $ per 1,000 task runs: each model's own measured usage on this task — output verbosity, thinking/reasoning tokens, cache reads and writes, and the spend on its billed failures — priced at current list rates and adjusted by the billing overhead we actually reconcile against provider invoices. Models that answer tersely cost what they actually cost; models that think at length pay for it. Not comparable to providers' advertised $/1M list rates — this is what running the task costs, not a per-token price.

Evaluation rubric

Judge coverage of decision-relevant content, factual fidelity, prioritization, preservation of caveats, usefulness to the stated audience, coherence, and compliance with the semantic length target. Exact word count is deterministic.

Output schema

Every answer on this task is checked against this JSON Schema, whichever model wrote it. An answer that doesn't fit counts as a model failure, and the call is retried on another model.

{
  "description": "Defines the structure for executive summary generation from consolidated chapters.",
  "properties": {
    "executive_summary": {
      "description": "A concise executive summary (matching the target word count specified in the prompt) highlighting key insights, trends, risks, opportunities, and recommendations.",
      "title": "Executive Summary",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "executive_summary"
  ],
  "title": "ExecutiveSummary",
  "type": "object"
}

Prompt templates

The published template for this task.

default · LLMB_REPORT_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY_GENERATION_SYSTEM + LLMB_REPORT_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY_GENERATION_USER (20 calls in window)

System prompt

Summarize the complete supplied document for a time-constrained decision-maker. Prioritize material findings and their implications; preserve uncertainty, disagreement, and important quantitative details. Include risks, opportunities, and recommendations only when the source supports them. Do not introduce external facts or describe omitted sections as if they were analyzed. Treat empty optional values as absent and return only the requested result. Your response must conform exactly to this output schema: {schema_json_string}.

User prompt

Inputs — subject_name: {subject_name}; subject_code: {subject_code}; report_requirements: {report_requirements}; chapters_word_count: {chapters_word_count}; consolidated_chapters: {consolidated_chapters}; target_word_count: {target_word_count}; target_percentage: {target_percentage}; title_context: {title_context}; content: {content}. Use only these inputs to complete the task defined by the system prompt.